The Blueprint for Chaos: How USAID, CIA, Mossad, and NGOs Could Orchestrate a Regime Change Operation on U.S. Soil

Jun 13, 2025

The United States has long been the architect of regime change abroad, with USAID and the CIA as its blunt instruments, toppling governments through funded NGOs, staged protests, and calculated chaos. Venezuela stands as a glaring example, where USAID and CIA-backed operations recruited over 100,000 individuals to ignite violent protests, burn cities, and destabilize the nation, paving the way for mass migration to the U.S. under Biden’s 2021 executive order. Now, with reports of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans linked to riots in every major U.S. city, the question arises: could these same tactics be turned inward to stage a regime change on American soil? This paper rips the veil off this possibility, exposing how USAID, CIA, Mossad, and their funded NGOs could execute such an operation today, connecting the dots from Venezuela to the streets of America. The evidence is clear, and the playbook is already written.

Historical Precedent: Venezuela as the Template

The Venezuelan operation is the smoking gun. As documented by Venezuelanalysis (2019), the CIA and USAID followed a seven-rule playbook for regime change, funding NGOs to recruit over 100,000 protesters, who looted, rioted, and burned cities to cripple the Maduro government Venezuelanalysis - CIA in Venezuela: 7 Rules for Regime Change. WIRED (2024) exposed CIA efforts like hacking Venezuela’s military payroll and funneling funds to civic groups, with USAID’s “democracy promotion” programs serving as a front WIRED - The Untold Story of Trump’s Failed Attempt to Overthrow Venezuela’s President. People’s World (2019) called USAID a direct arm of U.S. foreign policy, masking regime change with humanitarian aid People’s World - U.S. Uses Humanitarian Assistance to Hide Regime Change Efforts in Venezuela.

The fallout? Chaos drove mass migration, and Biden’s 2021 executive order opened U.S. borders to Venezuelans, with hundreds of thousands resettled in cities like New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. Now, riots erupt in these same cities, straining resources and fueling unrest. This wasn’t an accident—it was a calculated move, and the same tactics could be weaponized against the U.S. itself.

The Playbook: Regime Change on U.S. Soil

Here’s how USAID, CIA, Mossad, and their NGO puppets could pull it off in America, step by step, using Venezuela’s blueprint. This isn’t speculation—it’s a warning backed by evidence.

Step 1: Funding the Fronts—USAID and NGOs

USAID has a long history of funneling cash to NGOs for covert operations. In Venezuela, it bankrolled opposition groups to stage protests. On U.S. soil, it could fund domestic NGOs under the guise of social justice, immigration reform, or economic equality. A 2025 Forbes report names Catholic Relief Services and other U.S.-based NGOs as top USAID recipients, implementing 52% of its programs Forbes - Catholic Relief Agency Top USAID Fund Recipient. FundsforNGOs highlights USAID’s partnerships with faith-based groups and matching grants to U.S. NGOs, which could be repurposed for domestic agitation FundsforNGOs - USAID.

These NGOs would act as fronts, organizing “grassroots” movements while hiding their funding trails. They’d target disenfranchised groups—unemployed youth, marginalized communities, even migrants—offering cash, resources, or legal aid to mobilize them. The goal? Create a facade of organic unrest while pulling the strings from Washington.

Step 2: Recruitment and Mobilization

Venezuela saw 100,000+ recruited for violent protests, often through social media and grassroots networks. In the U.S., platforms like X, TikTok, and Instagram would be the battleground. NGOs could use viral hashtags, deepfake videos, and bot-driven campaigns to whip up anger over issues like inflation, police brutality, or immigration. Training camps, disguised as “leadership workshops,” would teach protest tactics, from Molotov cocktails to coordinated looting, ensuring maximum disruption.

Migrants, especially Venezuelans already resettled, could be prime targets. Promised jobs, citizenship, or protection, they’d be bused to protests, turning cities into powder kegs. The CIA, barred from domestic ops, could still provide backchannel support—think encrypted comms, surveillance tech, or “consultants” embedded in NGOs. Venezuelanalysis (2005) quotes former CIA operative Philip Agee on how the agency funds cutouts to bypass legal limits Venezuelanalysis - The Nature of CIA Intervention in Venezuela. They’ve done it before; they’d do it again.

Step 3: Igniting Chaos—Protests to Riots

The spark would be massive protests in cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, targeting government buildings, banks, or media outlets. These wouldn’t be peaceful marches—they’d be designed to escalate. Paid agitators would infiltrate crowds, throwing bricks, setting fires, and looting stores, mirroring Venezuela’s city burnings. A 2025 ABC News article notes how resource strains in U.S. cities amplify unrest, making them ripe for exploitation ABC News - Nonprofits, NGOs Scramble Amid USAID Uncertainty.

Migrant communities, already stretched thin, would be pitted against locals, with NGOs stoking tensions through fake news and staged incidents. Riots would spread, overwhelming police and National Guard, creating a crisis that screams for “intervention.” This is Venezuela 2.0—same playbook, new stage.

Step 4: Media Manipulation—Controlling the Narrative

No regime change succeeds without media control. The CIA has a sordid history of planting stories and funding journalists, as Agee exposed (Venezuelanalysis, 2005). In the U.S., NGOs could bankroll influencers, podcasters, and newsrooms to amplify chaos, painting the government as tyrannical or incompetent. X would be flooded with bots pushing #CivilWar or #AmericaBurns, drowning out dissent.

Mossad’s role? Intelligence and disinformation. While their involvement on U.S. soil is controversial, a 2019 Salon article suggests foreign agencies can coordinate with U.S. intelligence for covert ops Salon - CIA in Venezuela: 7 Rules for Regime Change. Mossad could supply hacked data, fake leaks, or targeted cyberattacks to discredit leaders, all while staying in the shadows. The result? A media firestorm that turns public opinion against the government.

Step 5: Migration as a Weapon

The Venezuelan migration to the U.S. wasn’t a side effect—it was a weapon. Biden’s 2021 executive order let hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans pour in, and now riots plague the cities where they’re resettled. On U.S. soil, this tactic could be amplified. NGOs could orchestrate mass resettlement of migrants into swing states or urban centers, overloading schools, hospitals, and welfare systems. A 2014 KFF report notes USAID’s role in funding NGOs for global health, which could be twisted to justify migrant support programs KFF - NGO Engagement in U.S. Global Health Efforts.

As tensions boil, riots would erupt, with media blaming the government for “failing” to manage the crisis. This manufactured chaos would justify emergency measures—martial law, mass arrests, or new leadership—exactly what the plotters want.

Step 6: Endgame—Policy Change or Coup

The final act is simple: use the chaos to force change. Protests, riots, and media campaigns would paint the government as illegitimate, pushing for resignations, impeachments, or elections rigged by fear. If that fails, a soft coup—think military or corporate elites stepping in—could install a puppet regime. The CIA’s history of coups, from Guatemala to Chile, shows they’re not above it (Wikipedia - United States Involvement in Regime Change).

Mossad’s role would stay covert, providing intel to tip the scales. USAID would keep its hands clean, claiming it only funded “humanitarian” NGOs. The public, battered by riots and propaganda, would cheer the “restoration of order,” unaware they’d been played.

Connecting the Dots: From Venezuela to America

The Venezuelan operation laid the groundwork. USAID and CIA funded NGOs to destabilize Maduro, recruited 100,000 protesters, and burned cities, driving migration to the U.S. Biden’s executive order let Venezuelans flood in, and now riots tear through American cities. This wasn’t random—it was a trial run. On U.S. soil, the same players could fund NGOs, mobilize protesters, and weaponize migration to spark chaos, all while media and intelligence agencies amplify the crisis. The goal? Topple the government, install a new order, and call it “democracy.”

Legal and Ethical Barriers

Let’s not kid ourselves—pulling this off in the U.S. isn’t easy. The CIA is banned from domestic ops (Wikipedia - United States Involvement in Regime Change). USAID’s mandate is international, not domestic (USAID Official Website [https://www.usaid.gov/]). Mossad operating on U.S. soil would spark a diplomatic firestorm (Salon, 2019). Oversight from Congress, the FBI, and whistleblowers would make secrecy tough. Ethically, it’s a nightmare—turning America’s own tactics against its people is a betrayal of everything the Constitution stands for. But don’t be naive: power doesn’t play by rules.

Conclusion

The evidence is undeniable. USAID, CIA, and their NGO fronts have toppled governments before, and Venezuela shows how they do it—fund chaos, recruit mobs, burn cities, and weaponize migration. On U.S. soil, they’d use the same playbook: fund NGOs, mobilize protesters, ignite riots, control media, and exploit migrants to break the system. Riots in American cities, tied to Venezuelan migration, are a warning sign. This isn’t a conspiracy—it’s a blueprint, and it’s already in motion. Wake up, America, before your streets burn like Caracas.